Likely last post to SteelChickens
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:52 am
I would like to thank SteelChickens for allowing the controversial comments and proving they are a true open forum. Certainly I did not appreciate some comments made, some did not appreciate my comments, but it is much better being open to all opinions.
I have tried to be as diplomatic as possible and want to finish with a statement that is as diplomatic as possible.
There is a difference between justifying your actions to your friends and club members and justifying your actions in a formal hearing.
The first of two problems the jury members had was having to acknowledge the same glove was worn all day without complaint. It was recognized and talked about. It makes it much more difficult to defend actions stating it was a disqualifying offense six hours after it was first worn. Anyone taking an objective point of view, such as members of a formal hearing, would see that as a problem.
The second of the problem was having to state the opinion that a device that covered three fingertips was exactly equal to the recognized definition of a glove which is: "a garment covering the whole hand". Additionally stating the device covering three fingertips fit the intent of the glove rule. Anyone taking an objective point of view, such as members of a formal hearing, would see that as a problem.
What prompted this last statement by me was after pondering the comment by Jim T
The controversy did not promote good feelings for anyone. It can't be good for the struggling sport to have this controversy to begin with. Thanks to the NRA caring about the integrity of the sport, it is not likely to happen again in the near future.
Is the sport better with less competition? Doubtful.
For me personally it is fortunate, yet unfortunate, that I do not have the mind of a champion. I was still bothered by what had happened because those that were behind this were at the range every time I was. It affected the way I shot. My scores when competing were always lower than when practicing. The additional struggle made the decision to stop shooting easy and not regretful.
I still believe Rifle Silhouette is a great sport and I truly wish everyone competing, and I do mean everyone, the best of luck in the future.
For the record, The fact I should have notified the Match Director has not been disputed anywhere. It was stated as a fault of mine by the NRA and I do not disagree with them.
Jerry
I have tried to be as diplomatic as possible and want to finish with a statement that is as diplomatic as possible.
There is a difference between justifying your actions to your friends and club members and justifying your actions in a formal hearing.
The first of two problems the jury members had was having to acknowledge the same glove was worn all day without complaint. It was recognized and talked about. It makes it much more difficult to defend actions stating it was a disqualifying offense six hours after it was first worn. Anyone taking an objective point of view, such as members of a formal hearing, would see that as a problem.
The second of the problem was having to state the opinion that a device that covered three fingertips was exactly equal to the recognized definition of a glove which is: "a garment covering the whole hand". Additionally stating the device covering three fingertips fit the intent of the glove rule. Anyone taking an objective point of view, such as members of a formal hearing, would see that as a problem.
What prompted this last statement by me was after pondering the comment by Jim T
The truth is about everyone lost. I do not know of anyone that gained except those that really wanted to have me stop shooting Rifle Silhouette.I hope it was worth it! They may miss one match, you will never shoot a competitive match for the rest of your life. You tell me who the loser is?
The controversy did not promote good feelings for anyone. It can't be good for the struggling sport to have this controversy to begin with. Thanks to the NRA caring about the integrity of the sport, it is not likely to happen again in the near future.
Is the sport better with less competition? Doubtful.
For me personally it is fortunate, yet unfortunate, that I do not have the mind of a champion. I was still bothered by what had happened because those that were behind this were at the range every time I was. It affected the way I shot. My scores when competing were always lower than when practicing. The additional struggle made the decision to stop shooting easy and not regretful.
I still believe Rifle Silhouette is a great sport and I truly wish everyone competing, and I do mean everyone, the best of luck in the future.
For the record, The fact I should have notified the Match Director has not been disputed anywhere. It was stated as a fault of mine by the NRA and I do not disagree with them.
Jerry