Reduced loads for .260

More expensive to feed, but worth it.
User avatar
Bob259
Uber Master Poster
Uber Master Poster
Posts: 4337
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:16 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Post by Bob259 »

Innocent wrote:Silence is golden. To hell with the shoe size. Simply take a measurement of the middle finger folded to touch the palm, then stretched out.

Innocent
I won't even ask how you know that...... :shock: Innocent.... yeah right =)) :ymdevil:
F Troop - Southwest Outpost

Proud Member of the Ram Slammers US Division (Two Bob)
kevinbear
AAA Poster
AAA Poster
Posts: 967
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:16 am
Location: Parker Colorado

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Post by kevinbear »

Wow Trent, you really dragged this thread down the low road :P
AAA Shooter politically incorrect and loving it
User avatar
Trent
Expert Master Poster
Expert Master Poster
Posts: 1652
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:39 pm
Location: Boise Idaho

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Post by Trent »

kevinbear wrote:Pretty quiet on here tonight, you guys re-check things and found you don't quite measure up! Btw Trent wears something like a size 12 shoe, don't tie him in a match, you'll lose! x_x
Size 14, and trust me I'd rather have a shorter measurement and be able to find shoes in my size.

Ok, maybe not. :D

Almost home from the UK. Sitting in Wash DC waiting to bounce to GA. Looking forward to seeing you fools in Missouri!
Jerry G
Uber Master Poster
Uber Master Poster
Posts: 2746
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: Casa Grande, AZ

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Post by Jerry G »

JB, what do you measure when you have a shoot-off with Joy or Kathleen? =))
RBriscoe
AA Poster
AA Poster
Posts: 372
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:23 am

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Post by RBriscoe »

Charlie,

Just a couple of thoughts.

I recommend lookings for some Sorbothane to make a recoil pad for your shooting vest.

http://www.sorbothane.com/

I would also take a look at my rifle's recoil pad and make sure the rifle is at max allowable weight (it probably is already, but...).

I have shot some loads similar to those Dan recommended, though not quite as low. I did try 34 grains of 4064 briefly, but it turned out to be position sensitive. That is something to look out for with very light loads.

You might give some thought to 130 grain bullets for rams. Several of the people used to use them with moderate loads with good results. I have shot them on occasion, but with loads I can not recommend in your situation. I can say that the felt recoil was noticeably less than similar loads with 142s.

Aside from the fact that you have a good supply of 4895, my experience with it in the .260 Rem suggests that it is, perhaps, a bit more flexible in use than Varget, a superb powder in its own right. I probably ought to work with it some more.

Good luck,

Rick
Jerry G
Uber Master Poster
Uber Master Poster
Posts: 2746
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: Casa Grande, AZ

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Post by Jerry G »

Kathy was shooting light loads at the nationals. I thought they were 95 gr at 3 close animals and 115 gr loads at rams in a 6.5. Seems to have worked for her. :ymdevil:
lone ringer
Master Poster
Master Poster
Posts: 1099
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:33 am
Location: CA

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Post by lone ringer »

Jerry G wrote:Kathy was shooting light loads at the nationals. I thought they were 95 gr at 3 close animals and 115 gr loads at rams in a 6.5. Seems to have worked for her. :ymdevil:
You meant to write 6mm, right Jerry?
User avatar
TXCharlie
A Poster
A Poster
Posts: 123
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:38 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Post by TXCharlie »

Tony and Rick.......Thanks for the info, glad the thread got back on track.
Here is some published info from Hodgdon http://www.hodgdon.com/PDF/H4895%20Redu ... 0Loads.pdf
Post Reply