Page 2 of 3

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:26 pm
by DanDeMan
kevinbear wrote:Here's the basic concept Dan, ball powders are coated with inhibitors that slow down the burning process accellerating the bullet down the barrel at a more gradual rate.....
Kevinbear,

Hate to break it to ya, but ALL nitrocellulose and nitrocellulose/nitroglycerine (double-base) powders have "inhibitors" coating them. How long have you been shooting??? And, were you born an asshole or did you have to grow into being one???

And then, you just pull snit out of where the sun don't shine by saying the following:

"Just to clarify one point, Dan's ram load is a maximum load, although it's only 36.0 grains I doubt my shoulder could take 10 of them in 5 minutes."

Have you even shot that load??? :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: I know you've never shot that load so how would you know, you CAN NOT? Man, you are one FOSAH. It's no wonder a number of shooters I know say they don't bother with this site anymore.

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:53 pm
by kevinbear
Checkmate.

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:16 pm
by DanDeMan
kevinbear wrote:Checkmate.
Please explain that, other than you are delusional.

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:35 am
by kevinbear
Lighten up Francis.

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 7:48 am
by malinois
Charlie, I dont know how long you will be down with the shoulder or if its a permanant thing..If your barrel is getting close to rebarrel time maybe you might concider a cartrige with a lighter powder charge maybe a 7mm Br or a 6mm Br I shot the 6Br and only used one bullet weight the 105 A-max recoil was very low and it made reloading a bit more simplifide since I only used one weight. I also shoot the 7mm Br recoil is about the same just a tad more with the 175's but not heavy. If you have a rifle with the 223 bolt head size even the 7mm tcu or 6.6mm tcu will work. Yes the 6Br will be a bit marginal but I had no issues with it and so what if you loose an animal now and then if it keeps you in the game...But I have lost animals with bigger calibers so why not look in to them.

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 10:57 am
by Trent
I believe the president of the silhouette club in Phoenix shoots a 6br and does very well, only leaving a Ram standing here and there. It definitely leaves some but recoil is very light!

I think Charlie got what he was looking for back on page one, so we can quit measuring dicks now.

Posting this from Edinburgh Scotland. My feet needed a break.

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 6:11 pm
by kevinbear
[quote="Trent"]

I think Charlie got what he was looking for back on page one, so we can quit measuring dicks now.

Good one Trent! Now... is that brit or scot humor?

Just in case anyone was wondering........http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=lig ... FORM=VIRE1

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:26 pm
by kevinbear
And if that wasn't enough here's another Bill Murray classic ....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9mf3Bypyk8

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:20 am
by malinois
measuring thingy's... really now. what a bunch.

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:29 pm
by Jim Beckley
Ya have to admit, measuring pee pee's sounds alittle better than reverse animal count.

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:46 pm
by Dee
Jim Beckley wrote:Ya have to admit, measuring pee pee's sounds alittle better than reverse animal count.
=)) =)) =))

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:13 pm
by kevinbear
Pretty quiet on here tonight, you guys re-check things and found you don't quite measure up! Btw Trent wears something like a size 12 shoe, don't tie him in a match, you'll lose! x_x

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:37 am
by Jim Beckley
After giving this much twisted thought, I think I have it. First off an official measurement must be taken and like a Grand Slam report it must be signed by at least 3 others (no cheating), measurments must be taken by either male or female, males must be of the type not to get excited during the measurement, females must be over 18. Then you will be issued a card (good for one year, age, use and abuse, may take some away). Hence when you are tied after a match you will simply pull out your official DMC card. The only thing that I want personally is to have a cold shower or a pail of ice near before I'm measured, to cause some shrinkage to give my competition a chance.

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:59 am
by Bob259
Jim Beckley wrote:After giving this much twisted thought, I think I have it. First off an official measurement must be taken and like a Grand Slam report it must be signed by at least 3 others (no cheating), measurments must be taken by either male or female, males must be of the type not to get excited during the measurement, females must be over 18. Then you will be issued a card (good for one year, age, use and abuse, may take some away). Hence when you are tied after a match you will simply pull out your official DMC card. The only thing that I want personally is to have a cold shower or a pail of ice near before I'm measured, to cause some shrinkage to give my competition a chance.
:-B :shock: :shock: =)) =))

Re: Reduced loads for .260

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:10 pm
by Innocent
Silence is golden. To hell with the shoe size. Simply take a measurement of the middle finger folded to touch the palm, then stretched out.

Innocent