Scope conundrum
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2015 9:12 am
Howdy folks,
I've been going back and forth on refining my scope situation and I'd like to hear your thoughts on which way to go. I'll say right off the bat that I DO NOT have $700-800 to drop on a Leopold scope so don't even suggest it.
Right now I have a Weaver V-16 with the standard Dual-X (duplex) reticle and for the most part I like it a lot: 1/4 MOA adjustments, AO that goes down to sub-30 feet, etc. 16X magnification is just fine for me although having the ability the zoom a little more may be helpful in some circumstances, but I don't feel like I need the extra magnification right now. The only thing I don't like is the duplex reticle and would rather have Weaver's "Varminter" reticle, but they don't offer it on the V-16.
The three options I'm considering are:
1. Send my scope to Weaver for a reticle change ($75).
2. Get a V-24 with the Varminter reticle ($350, but 1/8 MOA adjustments).
3. Get a V-16 with the fine crosshair with dot (1/8 MOA dot) and add on a BullzEye booster ($300 + $100, long-shot solution).
The way I see it...
-Changing my scope's reticle gives me what I want for the least cost but doesn't give me any extra zoom if I decide I want it later.
-The V-24 would be great but there is no option to get away from the 1/8 MOA adjustments. (I asked Weaver and they said no.)
-The V-16 FCD with booster is an interesting option but I'd have to buy everything and try it out. Could be a big winner or big loser!
So, given my situation what would you do?
Edit to add: this is for small-bore silhouette.
Edit #2 to add: I shoot almost weekly at an indoor range (~16 yards) for mid-week practice and Leopold scopes won't focus under 50 yards. The Weaver scopes focus to under 30 feet which makes them a match for me.
I've been going back and forth on refining my scope situation and I'd like to hear your thoughts on which way to go. I'll say right off the bat that I DO NOT have $700-800 to drop on a Leopold scope so don't even suggest it.
Right now I have a Weaver V-16 with the standard Dual-X (duplex) reticle and for the most part I like it a lot: 1/4 MOA adjustments, AO that goes down to sub-30 feet, etc. 16X magnification is just fine for me although having the ability the zoom a little more may be helpful in some circumstances, but I don't feel like I need the extra magnification right now. The only thing I don't like is the duplex reticle and would rather have Weaver's "Varminter" reticle, but they don't offer it on the V-16.
The three options I'm considering are:
1. Send my scope to Weaver for a reticle change ($75).
2. Get a V-24 with the Varminter reticle ($350, but 1/8 MOA adjustments).
3. Get a V-16 with the fine crosshair with dot (1/8 MOA dot) and add on a BullzEye booster ($300 + $100, long-shot solution).
The way I see it...
-Changing my scope's reticle gives me what I want for the least cost but doesn't give me any extra zoom if I decide I want it later.
-The V-24 would be great but there is no option to get away from the 1/8 MOA adjustments. (I asked Weaver and they said no.)
-The V-16 FCD with booster is an interesting option but I'd have to buy everything and try it out. Could be a big winner or big loser!
So, given my situation what would you do?
Edit to add: this is for small-bore silhouette.
Edit #2 to add: I shoot almost weekly at an indoor range (~16 yards) for mid-week practice and Leopold scopes won't focus under 50 yards. The Weaver scopes focus to under 30 feet which makes them a match for me.