NRA rule change
-
375Short
- AA Poster
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 7:43 am
- Location: Amarillo,Texas
NRA rule change
Pertaining to lever action front sight options: Pre 2025 NRA Rule books mentioned the specific insert shapes for Globe sights. That verbiage is deleted from the 2025 rule book. It’s easy to overlook but significant as one decides on what front sight they may like.
Wayne Byers
-
No1_49er
- A Poster
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 7:07 pm
- Location: over there
Re: NRA rule change
Can you advise us what wording (specific) has been changed from pre 2025 rules?
I have checked 3.1.3 as far back as 2020 and see no difference wrt permitted front aperture types.
2020 - The front sights must be a post or bead or a fixed non magnified round aperture.
2023 - The front sights must be a post or bead or a fixed non magnified round aperture.
2025 - The front sights must be a post or bead or a fixed non magnified round aperture.
Perhaps you are referring to a different part of the rule(s)?
Thanks
I have checked 3.1.3 as far back as 2020 and see no difference wrt permitted front aperture types.
2020 - The front sights must be a post or bead or a fixed non magnified round aperture.
2023 - The front sights must be a post or bead or a fixed non magnified round aperture.
2025 - The front sights must be a post or bead or a fixed non magnified round aperture.
Perhaps you are referring to a different part of the rule(s)?
Thanks
-
375Short
- AA Poster
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 7:43 am
- Location: Amarillo,Texas
Re: NRA rule change
2012 - The front sight must be a post or bead or if changeable inserts, may use a post or bead insert only.
The change was pre 2020 but don’t have a complete set of rule books to pinpoint the year.
The current rule is as you quoted. Round aperture is added and any mention of insert shape is dropped.
We can use a post , bead or round aperture as a front sight. A Lyman 17a is a round aperture, a legal type of front sight. Without inserts it is no sight at all. The restrictions once describing the inserts was removed.
If one can use a lens in the rear and a fiber optic rod in the front. It doesn’t seem logical that you can’t place inserts in your 17a aperture sight.
My guess is, like many rules, the author knew exactly what they intended to convey but if two people can’t read a rule and arrive at the same understanding it is poorly written. We are about a decade absent of the governing body having any presence to offer clarification.
I certainly don’t feel at a disadvantage by the insert my fellow competitors may choose. I hope the choice helps them gain a better site picture or feel more confidence and enjoyment.
That’s my take.
The change was pre 2020 but don’t have a complete set of rule books to pinpoint the year.
The current rule is as you quoted. Round aperture is added and any mention of insert shape is dropped.
We can use a post , bead or round aperture as a front sight. A Lyman 17a is a round aperture, a legal type of front sight. Without inserts it is no sight at all. The restrictions once describing the inserts was removed.
If one can use a lens in the rear and a fiber optic rod in the front. It doesn’t seem logical that you can’t place inserts in your 17a aperture sight.
My guess is, like many rules, the author knew exactly what they intended to convey but if two people can’t read a rule and arrive at the same understanding it is poorly written. We are about a decade absent of the governing body having any presence to offer clarification.
I certainly don’t feel at a disadvantage by the insert my fellow competitors may choose. I hope the choice helps them gain a better site picture or feel more confidence and enjoyment.
That’s my take.
Wayne Byers