Page 1 of 1
Mark Pharr stock-What do you think of them?
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 9:54 am
by dan2116
I'm looing at a new silhouette synthetic stock for my Anschutz 22lr and wanted to know about the Pharr stock. I know there expensive so are they worth it? I live in the north end of California and have not seen one.
Re: Mark Pharr stock-What do you think of them?
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 1:02 pm
by Jerry G
The Wooster and Pharr stocks are great. I have one of each.

Re: Mark Pharr stock-What do you think of them?
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 2:42 pm
by DavidABQ
Jerry G wrote:The Wooster and Pharr stocks are great. I have one of each.

Hey Jerry, what is your opinion of Merrier stocks? Any experience with them?
Re: Mark Pharr stock-What do you think of them?
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 5:06 pm
by ter
The Wooster fits me, I have two pharrs and they feel too exaggerated. I actually prefer the 1712 stock to the Pharr, but it is all personal preference.
Re: Mark Pharr stock-What do you think of them?
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 6:17 pm
by Ghostofwar
DavidABQ, I have a CZ with Merier right now that he is putting in one of his stocks. Once I get it back I'll do a full review. The initial impression is that it is just a slightly modified Pharr stock but he does have a few improvements to the stock that I like. He drills holes in the bottom of the barrel channel and in the butt for placing lead weights in. This allows you to adjust the balance of the rifle the way you want. The belly of the stock is also tall enough to make the CZ mags flush with the bottom of the stock. That's a big plus in my book.
The Pharr stock is also very nice. They seem to fit me very well so I like them. I've had a couple over the years. They seem to be a little higher quality and they price reflects that. It's all about how the stock fits you. I actually went to Merier's shop to get fitted for the stock. I wanted to make sure the trigger reach was just right since the trigger blade position isn't adjustable like on an Anschutz.
Re: Mark Pharr stock-What do you think of them?
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 5:25 am
by SqHunter
I have had at least one of all of those mentioned but prefer the Wooster. The grip on the Wooster stock is not as defined as the Pharr or Merrier, but there is more cast-off to the buttstock which I need for proper head position. It also helps that Steve is pleasant to work with.
Mr. Merrier will build them however you want them, but in my case to make weight with a Winchester it was so light as to be flimsy. This was not his fault entirely, I should not have tried to make a Hunter rifle out of my old C. However, it was a striking contrast to my first Roberston Composite Pharr which was very stiff. In my opinion they were the best made of the silhouette stocks. The grip on the Merrier is better shaped for me though, and I really liked the shelf at the bottom to rest your hand on.
All of them are an excellent improvement over the factory stocks, you really can't go wrong. Just make sure to get the right length of pull and also the right trigger placement. Both Steve and Wayne sent try stocks to measure this with, which I appreciated. You will also need to experiment with scope height, in my case I had to go very high with the Merrier but can shoot reasonable low with the Wooster. I don't remember what I had scope height set at on the Pharr stocks but believe it was somewhere between the other two.
All that said, I have a Tumbleweed's built rifle in a McMillan light sporter stock that is the most accurate rifle I have ever fired. It is simply amazing. It has been stolen though, my wife shot her best score ever this weekend with it and has not let it out of her sight since

Re: Mark Pharr stock-What do you think of them?
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 8:36 am
by Jerry G
Dave, I have no experience with them at all.
Re: Mark Pharr stock-What do you think of them?
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 5:37 pm
by DavidABQ
Jerry G wrote:Dave, I have no experience with them at all.
I was interested in an individual's opinion who had experience with all three.
Two out of three is not bad.
Re: Mark Pharr stock-What do you think of them?
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 7:51 am
by SqHunter
DavidABQ wrote:Jerry G wrote:Dave, I have no experience with them at all.
I was interested in an individual's opinion who had experience with all three.
Two out of three is not bad.
Be careful, they are an expensive habit

Re: Mark Pharr stock-What do you think of them?
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2016 6:30 am
by bjkramer
For the standard rifle I like the Anschutz Silhouette by McMillan. The Pharr stock is outstanding in workmanship, well designed and fits the hand and cheek. Have you considered a used Kimber HS? The HS stock fits me perfectly and the entire gun is designed for silhouette.
Re: Mark Pharr stock-What do you think of them?
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2016 4:15 pm
by dan2116
They are nice rifles . What are the triggers like on the Kimber HS 22. Can they be set below 1lb weight of pull
Re: Mark Pharr stock-What do you think of them?
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 11:57 am
by bjkramer
My Kimber HS has an excellent trigger pull for hunter class. I never tried to change the factory pull weight. You may want to check Rimfire Central. Someone on the Kimber page may have more information.